Another check: does specifying replication by server in such detail mean
we can't specify robustness at the transaction level? If we gave up that
feature, it would be a greatloss for performance tuning.
It's orthagonal. The kinds of configurations we're talking about simply
define what it will mean when you commit a transaction "with synch".
However, I think we're getting way the heck away from how far we really
want to go for 9.1. Can I point out to people that synch rep is going
to involve a fair bit of testing and debugging, and that maybe we don't
want to try to implement The World's Most Configurable Standby Spec as a
first step?
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
