Greg, to me it looks like we have very similar goals, but start from different preconditions. I absolutely agree with you given the preconditions you named.
On 10/08/2010 10:04 PM, Greg Smith wrote: > How is that a new problem? It's already possible to end up with a > standby pair that has suffered through some bizarre failure chain such > that it's not necessarily obvious which of the two systems has the most > recent set of data on it. And that's not this project's problem to > solve. Thanks for pointing that out. I think that might not have been clear to me. This limitation of scope certainly make sense for the Postgres project in general. Regards Markus Wanner -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
