On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Greg Stark <gsst...@mit.edu> wrote: > I don't think it's a big cost once all the processes > have been forked if you're reusing them beyond perhaps slightly more > efficient cache usage.
Hm, this site claims to get a 13% win just from the reduced tlb misses using a preload hack with Pg 8.2. That would be pretty substantial. http://oss.linbit.com/hugetlb/ -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
