On Oct 21, 2010, at 4:19 PM, Robert Haas wrote:

> 2010/10/21 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes:
>>> Excerpts from Cédric Villemain's message of jue oct 21 16:01:30 -0300 2010:
>>>> I agree this is interesting information to get, but wonder how
>>>> pg_config can know that and it looks to me that this information as
>>>> nothing to do in pg_config....
>>>> 
>>>> pg_config is all about installation, socket_dir is a postgresql.conf 
>>>> setting.
>> 
>>> Yeah -- how is pg_config to know?  All it can tell you is what was the
>>> compiled-in default.
>> 
>> That's what I wanted, actually.  If you've set a non-default value in
>> postgresql.conf, SHOW will tell you about that, but it fails to expose
>> the default value.
>> 
>>> Maybe you should go the SHOW route.  The user could connect via TCP and
>>> find out the socket directory that way.
>> 
>> Yeah, the SHOW case is not useless by any means.
> 
> I think adding this to pg_config is sensible.  Sure, the user could
> have moved the socket directory.  But it's a place to start looking.
> So why not?


Because pg_config is supposed to return the current state of a cluster?
Because it might indicate a connection to the wrong server?

Cheers,
M
-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to