On Tuesday 02 November 2010 18:33:15 Kevin Grittner wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > * You wont see an error if the next command after the IDLE in > > transaction is a COMMIT/ROLLBACK. I don*t see any sensible way > > around that. > Well, on a ROLLBACK I'm not sure it's a problem. On a COMMIT, > couldn't you call a function to check for it in CommitTransaction > and PrepareTransaction? Sure, throwing an error somewhere wouldnt be that hard. But at the moment a COMMIT is always successfull (and just reporting a ROLLBACK in a failed txn). Doesn't seem to be something to changed lightly.
Does anybody have any idea why COMMIT is allowed there? Seems pretty strange to me. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
