Marti Raudsepp <ma...@juffo.org> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 20:13, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> If open_dsync is so bad for performance on Linux, maybe it's bad
>> everywhere? Â Should we be rethinking the default preference order?
> So I think we should aim to fix old versions first. Do you disagree?
What's that got to do with it?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
