Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > Basically you're saying that the owner of the schema in which the > extension is installed can drop the extension ... even though, according > to your previous argument, the extension is not "in" said schema :-)
Yeah it's a case of defining things. The extension is not in the schema, it depends on it. So if you drop schema cascade, that cascades to drop extension. I'm not saying that the only way to do it sanely is the one I propose, but I did consider some alternatives and I did not code the current patch only by accident :) Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
