2010/11/9 Hitoshi Harada <umi.tan...@gmail.com>: > 2010/11/8 Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com>: >> 2010/11/8 Hitoshi Harada <umi.tan...@gmail.com>: > >>> Hmm, this looks very different from our writeable CTEs. And I can see >>> many issues like syntax ambiguity and execution order if we support >>> it. AFAIK the most significant reason why we are working on CTEs is >>> that CTEs are regarded as something like materialized table. >>> >>> So I think we are going on writeable "CTEs" unless there are no >>> objection rather than pursuing the standard. >>> Thanks for sharing anyway. >>> >> >> I found, so writeable CTE was implemented in Microsoft SQL server too. >> Can be our implementation compatible? >> > > I don't believe MS SQL Server doesn't implement such our writeable
I mean, "I don't believe it implements..." :) -- Hitoshi Harada -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
