On Nov 11, 2010, at 10:19 AM, Darren Duncan wrote: > I think that it would be best to implement MULTISET in the same way that a > TABLE is implemented. Logically and structurally they are the same thing, but > that a MULTISET typically is used as a field value of a table row. Aka, a > table and a multiset are just different names for a relation, loosely > speaking.
That sounds like a composite type to me. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
