Marko Tiikkaja <[email protected]> writes:
> On 13 Nov 2010, at 15:41, David Fetter <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Similarly, if a normal CTE called a data-changing function but was
>> nevertheless not referred to, it would still run.
> Actually, it wouldn't.
Indeed, and that was considered a feature when we did it. I think
that having wCTEs behave arbitrarily differently on this point
might be a bad idea.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
