2010/11/14 Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi>: > On 2010-11-12 8:25 PM +0200, I wrote: >> >> I'm going to take some time off this weekend to get a patch with this >> behaviour to the next commitfest. > > .. and a wild patch appears. > > This is almost exactly the patch from 2010-02 without > CommandCounterIncrement()s. It's still a bit rough around the edges and > needs some more comments, but I'm posting it here anyway. > > This patch passes all regression tests, but feel free to try to break it, > there are probably ways to do that. This one also has the "always run DMLs > to completion, and exactly once" behaviour. >
Could you update wiki on this feature if you think we've reached the consensus? http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/WriteableCTEs Also, wrapping up the discussion like pros & cons on the different execution models helps not only the advance discussions but also reviews of this patch. Regards, -- Hitoshi Harada -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
