Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>>> I'm not ignoring them; I just choose to work on other issues, since
>>> there is no viable proposal for fixing them.  I don't intend to put
>>> my time into dead ends.

>> So, that's a "show me a patch and we'll talk"?  Understood, then.

> Or even just a proposal.

Well, he did have a proposal ... it just wasn't very credible.  Moving
the hint bits around is at best a zero-sum game; it seems likely to
degrade cases we now handle well more than it improves cases we don't.
I think what we need is a fundamentally new idea, and I've not seen one.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to