Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I think allowing pg_dump to dump the data in an unlogged table is not >> only reasonable, but essential.
> Yeah, you'd have to allow a flag to control the behavior. And in that > case I'd rather the flag have a single default rather than different > defaults depending on whether or not individual tables were selected. > Something like --omit-unlogged-data. As long as the default is to include the data, I wouldn't object to having such a flag. A default that drops data seems way too foot-gun-like. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers