On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > Robert, All: > > I hope you're following the thread on -general about this feature. > We're getting a lot of feedback.
I haven't been; I'm not subscribed to general; it'd be useful to CC me next time. Reading through the thread in the archives, it seems like people are mostly confused. Some are confused about the current behavior of the patch (no, it really does always truncate your tables, I swear); others are confused about how WAL logging works (of course a backend crash doesn't truncate an ordinary table - that's because it's WAL LOGGED); and still others are maybe not exactly confused but hoping that unlogged table = MyISAM (try not to corrupt your data, but don't get too bent out of shape about the possibility that it may get corrupted anyway). -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
