On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 19:41, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > >>> I thought the proposal on the table was to add "peer" (or some other >>> name) to refer to the unix-socket auth method, and use that term >>> preferentially in the docs, while continuing to accept "ident" as an >>> old name for it. Is that really too confusing? > > What about the pg_ident file? Are we going to rename it? Are we
We should've done that long ago - it's already used for things that aren't ident. If anything, it should be pg_usermap.conf. > (better) going to have separate files for pg_peer and pg_ident? Why? It already supports multiple maps... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
