On Thursday 18 November 2010 21:11:32 Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of jue nov 18 17:00:04 -0300 2010: > > 2010/11/18 Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net>: > > >> I didn't say so nobody use it. You, me, David. But I really didn't see > > >> this pattern here in real applications. > > > > > > Lots of people are told to use it on IRC. Trust me, it's getting well > > > known. > > > > can be. but people on IRC are not representative. > > Yeah, that's true. I point out usage of unnest to our customers too, > but it's much more common to see people not using it, instead relying on > subscripts. People using Postgres show up unexpectedly from under > rocks, in the weirdest corners; they rarely consult documentation and > even more rarely get into IRC or mailing list to get help. Well, a good reason for that might be that unnest() is pretty new... Most code I read has been initially written quite a bit earlier. Seeing 8.4 in production is only starting to get common.
Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
