On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Just in a quick scan, I don't have any objection to v2 except that the >>> protocol documentation is lacking. >> >> OK, I'll mark it Waiting on Author pending that issue. > > The patch is touching protocol.sgml as follows. Isn't this enough?
How about some updates to the "Message Flow" section, especially the section on "COPY Operations"? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
