On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 16:33, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: >> On mån, 2010-11-22 at 12:37 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> Do we want to backpatch it into contrib/? > >> It's not a bug fix or an upgrading aid, so no. > > I'm less than thrilled about back-patching this, too. It seems to fly > in the face of all our historical practice. > > If you drop the bit about back-patching, then I don't particularly care > whether it goes into core or contrib for 9.1 --- whichever packaging > makes the most sense is fine.
My suggestion in the first place was not to backpatch it - I just wanted to get peoples opinions. I'm perfectly happy if we keep it somewhere else for the time being - as long as we make the binaries easily available. But that can go on the wiki for example. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
