Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > On 11/22/2010 12:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> No, because = isn't disallowed in names ...
> Ok, true, but it still might not be a bad heuristic to use for issuing a > warning on lookup. The fine manual says that using "=" in a connection name might be unwise because of the risk of confusion. It doesn't say that you should expect to get a NOTICE every single time you use the name. People have complained of postmaster log bloat for lots less reason than this. In any case I don't see an argument why warning on connection creation isn't sufficient. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers