On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> No, especially if it results in queries that used to work breaking, >> which it well could. But I'm not sure where to go with it from there, >> beyond throwing up my hands. > > Well, that's why there's been no movement on this since 2004 :-(. The > amount of work needed for a better solution seems far out of proportion > to the benefits.
We could extend the existing logic to handle multi-bytes characters though, couldn't we? It's not going to fix all the problems but at least it'll do something sane. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
