On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 14:48 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 2:01 PM, David E. Wheeler <da...@kineticode.com>
> wrote:
> > On Nov 22, 2010, at 6:03 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >
> >> ... "original patch". Sorry. Let's not fiddle with the names.
> >
> > To be clear, as things stand now, the new command is:
> >
> > ALTER TYPE name ADD VALUE new_enum_value [ { BEFORE | AFTER }
> > existing_enum_value ]
> >
> > So while the term in the SQL statement is "VALUE," it's called a "label" in
> > the documentation. I think that's confusing. Does anyone else?
>
> Yes. As between the two options, I favor changing the command. And
> let's also paint it pink.
We discussed this at West remember? When asked to paint a wall black we
ask, "which shade?".
JD
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
