On 24/11/10 09:43, Eliot Gable wrote:
However, it occurs to me that if you had a shared disk system via either iSCSI, Fiber Channel, NFS, or whatever (which also had higher I/O capabilities than a single server could utilize)
Yeah, current Postgres multi-master projects seem to be focusing on shared-nothing architecture as opposed to a shared-disk one. I guess the advantage of the former is that specialized (i.e expensive) hardware is not required to attempt to overcome the point of failure with shared-disk systems - the disk they share.
Cheers Mark
