On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 12:47:13PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 19:49, Radosław Smogura <m...@smogura.eu> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Maybe you are interested about this what I done with JDBC > > <snip> > > > > Driver is here http://www.rsmogura.net/pgsql/pgjdbc_exp_20101130_C.tar.gz is > > currently JDK 6 compatible (will be not), compressed patch takes about 136kb > > gziped. > > Is there any particular reason why this work can't be maintained as a > branch to the main driver? My understanding is your work is based off > that one? Being able to work like that would make things a lot easier > to review. > > That said, such a process would also be a lot easier if the JDBC > driver wasn't in cvs ;)
This brings up an excellent point. Would the people now developing the JDBC driver object to switching to git? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
