On 12/3/10 12:27 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 2:56 PM, r t <pg...@xzilla.net> wrote:
>> What exactly was the objection to the following -->
>> ALTER TABLE table_name ADD PRIMARY KEY (column_list) USING index_name;
>> Is the objection that you might have been trying to specify a constraint
>> named "using" ? I'm willing to make that option more difficult. :-)
>
> I think it's that someone might expect the word after USING to be the
> name of an index AM.
Seems unlikely to cause confusion to me.
However, I don't see why we need (column_list). Surely the index has a
column list already?
ALTER TABLE table_name ADD CONSTRAINT pk_name PRIMARY KEY USING index_name
... seems like the syntax most consistent with the existing commands.
Anything else would be confusingly inconsistent with the way you add a
brand-new PK.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
