Tom Lane wrote: > argue that there was a regression. It's certainly a performance bug > though: nobody would expect that giving a query *more* work_mem would > cause it to run many times slower.
I wouldn't be that surprised - otherwise it'd just be hard-coded to something large. Especially since earlier in the thread: > The example is *not* particularly slow if you leave work_mem at default. which makes me think it's arguably not quite a bug. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
