On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:20, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > It seems like pg_read_binary_file() is good to have regardless of > whatever else we decide to do here. Should we pull that part out and > commit it separately?
OK, I'll do that, but I have some questions: #1 Should we add 'whole' versions of read functions in Dimitri's work? #2 Should we allow additional directories? In the discussion, no restriction seems to be a bad idea. But EXTENSION requires to read PGSHARE or some system directories? #2 can be added separately from the first change, but I'd like to add #1 at the same time if required. Or, if we're planning not to use pg_read_file functions in the EXTENSION patch, we don't need #2 anyway. -- Itagaki Takahiro -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers