On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> But if it annoys you, it seems OK to change it. Don't see a reason to 
>> backpatch though?
>
> I think that It's worth backpatch to prevent users who observe the
> occurrence of the query conflicts carefully for testing 9.0 from
> getting confusing.

I don't think this is important enough to back-patch, but it does seem
like a good idea in general, so committed, but just to the master
branch.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to