On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> I imagine the reason for the original coding was to avoid a useless
>>> gettimeofday kernel call in the common case that there are no
>>> conflicting xacts to wait for.  Could we restore that behavior?
>
>> Something like the attached?
>
> I would just add the return-at-the-top.  Changing the loop logic is
> not necessary --- the loop test is cheap.

Hmm... that's a fine bit of hairsplitting, but OK.

Done that way, then.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to