> Is there any rhyme or reason to these ISO format date parsing rules? Yes. Though adjustments to the rules are possible, so things are not set in concrete. There *should* be a complete description of the date/time parsing rules in the User's Guide appendix.
> Why can't someone store the year without having to pad with zeros for years > between 100 and 999? To help distinguish between day numbers and years. We used to allow more variations in the length of a year field, but have tightened it up a bit over the years. > What's wrong with 30-1-1 and below? Why does 40 work and not 30? Because "30" *could* be a day. "40" can only be something intended to be a year. And input is not enforced to be strictly ISO-compliant, so "30-1-1" *could* be interpreted multiple ways. - Thomas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])