On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:28:17PM +0200, Pavel Golub wrote: > Hello, Pavel. > > You wrote: > > PS> Hello > > PS> Dne 21. prosince 2010 21:11 Tom???? Mudru??ka <to...@mudrunka.cz> > napsal(a): > >> > >> Thx for you answers :-) > >> Well... i know that i can write my own plugin and i am familiar with C so > >> this is not the problem, but i think that such feature should be > >> implemented directly in PgSQL because there are already functions for > >> converting to/from base 16 so why don't make this more flexible and > >> generalize it to any other radix? It's quite simple to do and i don't see > >> any reason why 16 should be there and 8, 32 or 36 shouldn't :-) > >> > > PS> * It isn't a typical and often request, > PS> * There are not hard breaks for custom implementation, > PS> * You can use plperu or plpython based solutions, > PS> * It's not part of ANSI SQL > > But MySQL has such function. What's wrong with us? ;) >
You are not really helping to make a good case... :) Ken -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
