* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > However, it'd be a real good idea for that role to be NOLOGIN if it's > there by default.
Definitely. I'd also suggest we WARN if someone creates a situation
where a role has both replication and login, and maybe prevent it
altogether, it's just a bad idea..
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
