On Dec 24, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Agreed. Perhaps we need an anti-TODO that lists things we don't want in > more detail. The TODO has that for a few items, but scaling things up > there will be cumbersome.
I don't really think that'd be much better. What might be of some value is summaries of previous discussions, *with citations*. Foo seems like it would be useful [1,2,3] but there are concerns about bar [4,5] and baz[6]. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
