mlw wrote: > > Upon doing some inspection of apache 2.x, it seems that me making a SysV > Windows .DLL for PostgreSQL, while a cool project, would be unnecessary. > > The APR (Apache Portable Runtime) seems to have all the necessary support. The > problem is that it has its own API. > > We should find a way to extract the APR out of apache and make it a library > within PostgreSQL. A quick look at the license seems to indicate this is OK. > Should we notify the Apache guys just to be polite?
Definitely. They make also be able to offer some tips and guidance (i.e. there may already be a way of splitting it off easy, etc), but we'll never know if we don't say hello. (Hey, that rhymes!) :-) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift > It looks like the APR is pretty analogous to SysV with a few changes, so it > should not be too hard to code it into PostgrsSQL. > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org -- "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
