Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> Attached patch implements a function called pg_primary_conninfo() that
> returns, well, the primary_conninfo used on the standby when in
> streaming replication mode (otherwise NULL).
> Objections?
What's the use case? And aren't there security reasons to NOT expose
that? It might contain a password for instance.
> + if (recptr.xlogid == 0 && recptr.xrecoff == 0 && conninfo[0] != '\0')
> + PG_RETURN_NULL();
This test seems a bit incoherent.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
