On Dec 28, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Joachim Wieland <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Andy Colson <[email protected]> wrote: >> I know its been discussed before, and one big problem is license and patent >> problems. >> >> Would this project be a problem: >> >> http://oldhome.schmorp.de/marc/liblzf.html > > It looks like even liblzf is not going to be accepted. I have proposed > to only link against liblzf if available for pg_dump and have somehow > failed, see:
I thought that was mostly about not wanting multiple changes in one patch. I don't see why liblzf would be objectionable in general. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
