Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Looking at the predicate lock splitting, it occurs to me that > it's possible for a non-serializable transaction to be canceled if > it needs to split a predicate lock held by a concurrent > serializable transaction, and you run out of space in the shared > memory predicate lock area. Good point. We don't want that, for sure. > Any chance of upgrading the lock to a relation lock, or killing > the serializable transaction instead? Absolutely. Good suggestion. Thanks! -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
