On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 19:49, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Dec 29, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >>> We can be held responsible for the packaging decisions if they use >>> *our* "make install" commands, imho. >> >> Yep. > > So, as I see it there are two ways of doing it - install a > catversion.h file and include it from libpq-fe.h, or modify the > libpq-fe.h. I still think modifying libpq-fe.h is the better of these > choices - but either of them would work. But is the catversion value > really the best interface for the user? This is about libpq > functionality level, which really has nothing to do with the backend > catalog, does it?
It doesn't seem to me that a change of this type requires a catversion bump. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
