On Jan 3, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > "David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes: >> I rather doubt that "WRAPPER" will be accepted as a reserved word in the >> grammar. > > It's already in the grammar, and I didn't change its "level".
Okay. >>> dim=# create wrapper extension lo; >>> CREATE EXTENSION >> >> What happened to your UPGRADE from NULL idea? > > You upgrade an installed extension, right? What? >>> The WRAPPER keyword meaning is that we're only creating the catalog >>> entry, forcing version to NULL and not running the extension's script. >>> This keyword looked like the best choice from existing ones in our >>> grammar, please feel free to pick any other phrase here. >> >> I don't see why it's necessary at all. > > Care to offer an alternative or go in any level of details about what > you have in mind and how *exactly* you think it should work? I've not > been offered psychic powers this Christmas, sorry… That's what I understood your original "UPGRADE from NULL" being. Did I misread you? Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
