On Jan 3, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:

> Not what I have understood.
> 
>  http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-12/msg01014.php
>  http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-12/msg01045.php
> 
> AS there was no answer, the meaning for me is that it was ok to
> proceed.  On this list people agreeing often remain silent.

There were several of us who were not silent.

  http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-12/msg00804.php
  http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-12/msg00796.php

The fact that the last two messages in the thread say something else does not 
mean that they represent the consensus.

>>> Note that we always need to support the placeholder here, because of
>>> course following dependencies at this point isn't possible.
>> 
>> I thought placeholders were going away, too. Did I lose track?
> 
> Oh, dear, yes :)  See the documentation for the relocatable parameter.
> We know handle two kinds of extensions, some of them you can't offer
> better than placeholders to allow users to define the schema where they
> will land.  Also, at upgrade time, I don't see any other way to solve
> the problem.  Do you?
> 
>  http://pgsql.tapoueh.org/extensions/doc/html/extend-extension.html

Right, I forgot about the relocatable parameter. I kind of expect that most 
extensions *would* be relocatable, though. Maybe it should be expected to be 
true if it's not present? Or perhaps require non-relocatable extensions to have 
a "fixed_schema" control key or something? Either will work, just trying to 
find the likely convention to avoid configuration in most cases. Maybe I'm 
wrong, though, and most extensions wouldn't be relocatable?

> Yeah.  Before extension existed, it has always been working like that,
> our users already depend on such a behavior, nothing new here.  I just
> don't see how extension could solve that is all I'm saying.

Fair enough.

>> The new .so should not be installed until the upgrade is been run.
> 
> Nice statement.  How do you make that happen?

Nope.

David


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to