Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: > It would be useful (this would allow per-standby buffer tables, for that > matter), but it would also be tremendously difficult. Seems worthy of a > TODO, though.
Don't we have anything covering xid-less tables in the TODO already? The read-only tables "compressions" of removing large part of headers seems to come up often enough… Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
