On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 19:48 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 19:46, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > > > >> To my way of thinking, pg_stat_walsender and pg_stat_walreceiver would > >> be more clear than pg_stat_replication_master and > >> pg_stat_replication_slave. > > > > Let's commit it so that some of us can get a look at the data it > > contains, and then we can fix the name during beta. > > We try to avoid inidb-requiring changes (like renaming a system > object...) during beta.
Why? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
