On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 05:06:34PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Jan 11, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > The whole thing just seems too fragile and dangerous to be worth dealing > > with given that actual usage will be a corner case. *I* sure wouldn't > > trust it to work when the chips were down. > > I hope this assessment proves to be incorrect, because like Magnus and > Heikki, I think this will be a major usability improvement. It takes us from > "there's a way to do that" to "it just works".
(It just works)++ :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
