On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes: >> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Killing active sessions when it's not absolutely necessary is not an >>> asset. > >> That's a highly arguable point and I certainly don't agree with it. > > Your examples appear to rely on the assumption that background processes > exit instantly when the postmaster dies. Which they should not.
But they do. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
