Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of jue ene 13 00:05:53 -0300 2011:
> Srini Raghavan wrote:
> > Thank you very much for reviewing, appreciate the feedback.? As pointed out
> > by
> > you, it is always best to test it out with the latest version, so, I tested
> > the
> > same approach with postgres 9.0.2 on windows just now, and it works!
> >
> >
> > I forgot to mention earlier that in addition to setting
> > vacuum_freeze_table_age
> > to 0, vacuum_freeze_min_age must also be set to 0 to reset xmin with the
> > FrozenXid.
>
> I wonder if you should be using VACUUM FREEZE instead of having to set
> variables.
The documentation says you shouldn't:
FREEZE
Selects aggressive "freezing" of tuples. Specifying FREEZE is equivalent to
performing VACUUM with the vacuum_freeze_min_age parameter set to zero. The
FREEZE option is deprecated and will be removed in a future release; set the
parameter instead.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/sql-vacuum.html
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
