On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> this seems to be speeding up the first run by 6x at the expense of >> slowing down many subsequent runs by 10-15%. > > If the overall throughput when measured far enough out to have hit a > steady state again is anywhere in the neighborhood of the unpatched > throughput, the leveling of the response times has enough value to > merit the change. At least in my world.
I think it would eventually settle down to the same speed, but it might take a really long time. I got impatient before I got that far. I'm hoping some will pick it up and play with it some more (hint, hint). -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
