Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > In 9.0, we specifically require using "replication" as database name > to start a replication session. In 9.1 we will have the REPLICATION > attribute to a role - should we change it so that "all" in database > includes replication connections? It certainly goes in the "principle > of least surprise" path..
No, not at all. If we had set things up so that roles with replication bit could *only* do replication, it might be sensible to think about that, but we didn't. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers