I'm compiling postgresql 9.0.2 using msys + mingw + gcc 4.5.2 (latest official release from mingw). This is on Windows 7 64-bit.

Unfortunately the built dlls, at least libpq.dll, crash if they need to be relocated. This happens to me when loading libpq.dll into a project that has a number of other dll requirements. Note this does NOT happen when building with gcc 3.4.5.

Using GDB to track down the problem, the error occurs in __gcc_register_frame and looks to be the same error described here:

http://old.nabble.com/Bad-DLL-relocation---reproducible-w--test-case-td18292380.html

Note a similar sounding error described, and fixed, in newer releases of binutils (which mingw provides and I am using) is described here:

http://lists-archives.org/mingw-users/11369-error-0xc0000005-is-now-fixed.html

Looking at the postgresql Makefiles, the dlls are built using dllwrap. In particular, see src/Makefile.shlib line 413 and src/Makefile.port line 25.

When I change these to not use dllwrap and instead just use gcc -shared the problem goes away. Therefore I'd like to propose:

1.  Change line 413 in src/Makefile.shlib

$(DLLWRAP) -o $@ --dllname $(shlib) $(DLLWRAP_FLAGS) --def $(DLL_DEFFILE) $(OBJS) $(LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS_SL) $(SHLIB_LINK)

To:

$(CC) -shared -o $@ $(DLL_DEFFILE) $(OBJS) $(LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS_SL) $(SHLIB_LINK)

2.  Changle line 73 in src/Makefile.port:

$(DLLWRAP) -o $@ --def $*.def $< $(LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS_SL) $(BE_DLLLIBS)

To:

$(CC) -shared -o $@ $*.def $< $(LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS_SL) $(BE_DLLLIBS)

I tested this by intentionally compiling libpq.dll using the link flag -Wl,--image-base to make sure that its base address conflicted with another dll loaded by my program. With the proposed changes, windows successfully relocated libpq.dll without causing a segmentation fault.

I don't claim to know why dllwrap is producing dlls that can't be relocated while gcc -shared is. But it appears to have been deprecated back in 2006 according to the binutils mailing list:

http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-binutils@gnu.org/msg01470.html

So between being deprecated and not producing relocatable dlls, it seems like its best to stop using dllwrap. If this seems like a reasonable change I can put together a quick patch if that helps.

Thanks,

Charlie

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to