On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:56, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >>> We should treat log_disconnections the same? >> >> We could keep it a boolean, but then only log disconnections for the >> cases that are mentioned in log_connections? >> >> It doesn't make sense to log disconnection for a connection we didn't >> log the connection for... > > Maybe true. But, at least for me, it's more intuitive to provide both as > enum parameters.
Is there *any* usecase for setting them differently though? (other than connections being <something> and disconnectoins being <none>?) If not, aren't we just encouraging people to configure in a way that makes no sense? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
