Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> No, I don't think so. Has any evidence been submitted that that part of >> the patch is of benefit?
> I think you might be mixing up what's actually in the patch with > another idea that was proposed but isn't actually in the patch. The > patch itself does nothing controversial. Oh, I misread Itagaki-san's comment to imply that that *was* in the patch. Maybe I should go read it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers