On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > The question we should have asked is "Why is removing those log entries > helpful?". I shouldn't have to justify putting something back, when the > good reason for its existence was previously explained and there was no > consensus to remove in the first place.
This is simply revisionist history. It was discussed for several days, and consensus was eventually reached. The fact that you chose not to participate in that discussion until after it was over doesn't mean we didn't have it, and the fact that you don't agree with the outcome doesn't mean there wasn't consensus. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers